Leadership Assessments

Accelerate your strategy with leaders who are proven to make a difference

A changing world requires different leadership. Agility, moral compass, and power to change are more important than job title or seniority.

Our leadership assessments provide objective, evidence-based insights into potential, role fit, team and culture impact, and risk. With that, you make better appointments, strengthen the leadership bench, and target L&D interventions where they count.

Why leadership assessments?

Reduce strategic risk

Miscasts cost money, time, and credibility. A multi-method assessment (tests + simulations + structured interviews) increases predictive power and makes both risks and mitigations explicit and manageable.

From intuition to evidence

Standardized criteria and psychometrically based measurements perform better than loose impressions. Decisions become reproducible, explainable, and fair; even if you consciously choose an atypical profile.

More impact on teams and results

Effective leaders strengthen organizational health, psychological security and executive strength; this is reflected in productivity, quality and talent retention.

Ready-now and ready-later

Clear data on potential, stretch and derailers accelerate succession and make your talent pipeline agile.

On this page

Why exactly now?

Governance

Leadership appointments require governance-proof decisions. Our assessments make appointments explainable and defensible: fixed criteria, validated measurements, and psychological expert opinion provide an audit trail for supervision, Supervisory Board, Executive Board, and Works Council. This reduces risks (bias, misfit, reputation) and builds support for the chosen candidate.

Hybrid work and pressure on managers

Today’s leadership requires coaching, giving direction, learning to accelerate, and connecting by building psychological safety. Assessments make these leadership skills testable and their developability transparent.

Tight labor market

Every decision must hit the mark: maximize quality and sustainable fit while minimizing onboarding risks.

Skill-based organizing

Work is becoming modular; leaders must drive skills, data, and collaboration across silos. Assessments make those capabilities visible and comparable.

Leadership assessment at Starcheck

Our approach

What we measure and why

When do you deploy leadership assessment?

Selection & promotion

Substantiate job fit, visibility into leadership gaps, risk mitigations; accelerate onboarding.

Succession planning

View of ready-now/ready-later and stretch potential.

Turnaround or growth phase

Test change capacity, execution discipline and culture fit.

Team development

Strengthen leadership style, psychological safety and collective intelligence for optimal team complementarity.

Leadership assessment for each stage

Leadership potential
first line/new in position

Focuses on learning ability, basic leadership styles, and coaching needs. This assessment provides insight into how novice leaders can shape their role, where their natural style lies, and what support they need to grow effectively.

Leadership skills
middle management

Measures the degree of results orientation, influence over people, change power, and ability for team development. This level targets executives who are operationally strong but want to increase their impact within the organizational context.

Strategic leadership
senior / executive level

Tests strategic thinking skills, change capacity, cultural behaviors, and the ability to handle moral and ethical dilemmas. This assessment focuses on leaders who set direction, lead transitions, and demonstrate exemplary behavior in complex governance environments.

Want to know who is ready for the next step?

Schedule an appointment right away

Schedule an appointment and discover how leadership assessments contribute to agile, inclusive, and strategic leadership.

Plan een gesprek

Plan een gesprek

Schedule a call

Schedule a call

Ik heb een assessment vraag.

Plan a demo

Plan a demo

Evidence-based Selection Methods.

This fact sheet provides an overview of the most commonly used (psychological) selection methods, both classical and modern. The figures are based on meta-analyses and dominant scientific literature.

Method Predictive validity (r) Typical reliability
Cognitive ability (GMA test) .51 High (.85-.95)
Work test .54 High
(inter-rater ≥.70)
Structured interview .51 Medium-high (.60-.75)
Unstructured interview .18-.38 Low-medium (.40-.55)
Integrity test .41 High (α ≥.80)
Conscientiousness (Big Five) .31 Medium-high (α ~.75-.85)
Job knowledge test .48 High (≥.80)
Years of service .18 Not applicable
Video/asynchronous interview (incl. AI) .30-.40 Good at structuring; algorithmically variable
Machine learning / algorithmic models .20-.50 Depends on dataset; generalizability limited
Serious games / game-based work samples .35-.50 High on objective metrics
Social media screening .00-.20 Low and variable

Assessment request

Call directly:
+31 88 277 377 6